Tuesday, May 7, 2019

The Benevolent Atheist

I saw this on the /r/Atheism subreddit
If an Atheist is a good person, will they go to heaven or hell? If hell, then I don't believe in a God that punishes good people for eternity.  If heaven, then what's the point of believing in God?
Another way to ask this would be:
What gets a person into heaven, being good or believing in God?

Of course, the original poster wasn't interested in this answer.  It was really a use of logical fallacy to justify being an atheist.  Still, both questions are pointless since atheist don't believe in an afterlife.  For a meaningful debate, it's important to frame a question within bounds of shared beliefs and assumptions.  For example, both atheist and theist should agree to these points:
  • There is some universal measure of being good (kindness, do no harm, show respect, etc.)
  • The world is a better place if people are good
  • We are born into this world
  • While we are alive, we behave with some level of goodness
  • After we die, we cannot measurably act on this world or the people in it

So our new question with shared understanding is:
What is more likely to influence a person to be good while alive, being an atheist or believing in God?

There may be the standout "benevolent atheist" or "wicked theist", but what about a million people? Would they collectively be more benevolent as atheists or theists?

That is a worthwhile debate. 

An interesting post on the same subreddit

No comments: