In "The Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking", by Richard Paul and Linda Elder, the idea of ethical thinking was presented. I like to create models to help me understand the ideas, so here's my model.
Imagine groups of people with common thinking patterns, beliefs, biases, etc. You find yourself in one of the groups, most likely due to your upbringing, where you grew up and who you associated with.
As you've developed critical thinking skills, you managed to make some sense of the complicated world we live in. You learn that these skills apply as much to yourself as others, even when inconvenient. You have developed...
Intellectual Integrity or, consistent standards for thinking that you apply to yourself and others.
Soon you start finding problems with the way your group thinks. You feel an obligation to be true to your new understandings and not shy away, in spite of any negative consequences. What you need is...
Intellectual Courage or, the ability to face difficult ideas that go against your previously held ideas.
Next you find that the framework for thinking of your group is not working anymore. Also, members of your group keep pushing back on your courageous thinking. What you need is...
Intellectual Autonomy or, having control of your own beliefs and values. But it feels lonely going it alone. What you need is...
Intellectual Perseverance or, the ability to endure hardships and stick to your principles. Even then, you still need to live in this world and interact with others that don't use critical thinking. What you need is...
Intellectual Empathy or, an understanding of the forces and conditions that have lead to others thinking and believing how they do. It also helps us remember when we ourselves had similar ways of thinking. This often leads to...
Intellectual Humility or, an awareness of the limitations in our own understanding, biases and egocentrism. You realize that you don't know as much as you think you know.