Everything is a red herring...almost. A red herring is most likely a true statement, but it distracts from what's truly important. Here are some examples:
Federal Deficit and Debt
The out-of-control Federal spending is leading us to a fiscal crisis. I recently posted about D.O.G.E in response to red herrings related to the department. These red herrings point to specific examples of cuts that will cause harm. Still, none of them address the real problem: the interest payments on our debt are already more than our defense spending, which will soon be our country's biggest expense item, surpassing both Social Security and Healthcare spending. I've written about this for over 15 years here, here, here, and here.
Cyberwarfare and Political Polarization
We are under attack. Cyberwarfare is conducted against the U.S. by Russia, China, Iran, North Korea, and others. These attacks are well documented in "This Is How They Tell Me The World Ends: The cyber weapons arm race" by Nicole Perlroth, and "Sandworm" by Andy Greenberg. Our enemies' goal is to create chaos in the U.S., and they are succeeding. I've written about the polarization in the U.S. here and here. Most of the political polarization is just intentionally induced red herrings.
Environmental Sustainability
🔵 Red Herrings from Climate Change Advocates
-
"The world will end in X years"
→ Overstating urgency with doomsday timelines can discredit valid concerns and scientific models.
Red herring: Shifts focus from actionable mitigation to fear-based speculation. -
"Anyone who questions anything is a denier"
→ Not all critiques are denial; some are about policy, economics, or priorities.
Red herring: Avoids engaging with legitimate nuances. -
"It's all the fault of big oil"
→ While fossil fuel companies play a major role, blaming them exclusively avoids discussing individual or governmental responsibility.
Red herring: Oversimplifies a complex, systemic issue. -
"We must act now, regardless of cost"
→ Urgency is real, but ignoring economic trade-offs can alienate support.
Red herring: Sidesteps cost-benefit or equity discussions.
🔴 Red Herrings from Climate Change Skeptics
-
"The climate has always changed"
→ True, but irrelevant to the current rate, causes, and human contributions.
Red herring: Distracts from the core issue of anthropogenic climate change. -
"It was really cold last week"
→ Weather ≠ climate.
Red herring: Uses short-term data to undermine long-term trends. -
"Scientists used to warn about global cooling"
→ A fringe hypothesis in the 1970s, not a serious consensus.
Red herring: Undermines current science by misrepresenting past uncertainty. -
"Environmentalists are hypocrites who fly in jets"
→ Even if true, it doesn't disprove the reality of climate change.
Red herring: Attacks the messenger, not the message.